🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed ruling, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to implement a newly configured congressional district plan that may create as many as five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 ruling, released on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to set aside a lower court's injunction that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating significant confusion and upsetting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the order stated in explaining its decision.

The federal court had determined that Texas had likely sorted voters based on their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the boundaries. It had instructed the state to use the districts created after the 2020 census for the upcoming election.

Strong Opposition

Through a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's decision. She argued that it disregarded the work of the district court, noting that its opinion was actually authored by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

This decision occurs during a nationwide fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican control. Typically, redistricting takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that are estimated to yield a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have countered with new maps in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Responses

The Texas top lawyer hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he remarked.

In contrast, Democratic officials decried the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

Another leading Democratic leader argued the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by approving a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.